Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 54
Filter
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(12): 2463-2467, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20239239

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders in high-risk occupation workers in an urban setting. METHODS: The analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in Karachi from July to December 2020, and comprised office workers, operation theatre technicians and coolies. The presence of musculoskeletal disorders was assessed using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire to determine factors associated with moderate to severe condition. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 300 male subjects, 100(33.3%) each were office workers, operation theatre technicians and coolies. The overall mean age was 33.25±6.8 years (range: 18-50 years). The overall prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders was 179(59.7%). Besides, 117(65.4%) patients with musculoskeletal disorders had intermediate stage of the disease. The lower back and neck were the most common site of trouble involved in preceding 12 months 111(43.6%) each. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders was found to be a common problem affecting high-risk occupational workers.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Humans , Male , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/complications , Risk Factors , Occupations , Surveys and Questionnaires , Prevalence
2.
RMD Open ; 9(2)2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20232340

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To identify facilitators and barriers towards vaccination in general and specifically against pneumococci, influenza and SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMD). METHODS: Between February and April 2021, consecutive patients with RMD were asked to complete a structured questionnaire on general knowledge about vaccination, personal attitudes and perceived facilitators and barriers towards vaccination. General facilitators (n=12) and barriers (n=15) and more specific ones for vaccination against pneumococci, influenza and SARS-CoV-2 were assessed. Likert scales had four response options: from 1 (completely disagree) to 4 (completely agree). Patient and disease characteristics, their vaccination records and attitudes towards vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 were assessed. RESULTS: 441 patients responded to the questionnaire. Knowledge about vaccination was decent in ≥70% of patients, but <10% of patients doubted its effectiveness. Statements on facilitators were generally more favourable than on barriers. Facilitators for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were not different from vaccination in general. Societal and organisational facilitators were more often named than interpersonal or intrapersonal facilitators. Most patients indicated that recommendations of their healthcare professional would encourage them to be vaccinated-without preference for general practitioner or rheumatologists. There were more barriers towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination than to vaccination in general. Intrapersonal issues were most frequently reported as a barrier. Statistically significant differences in response patterns to nearly all barriers between patients classified as definitely willing, probably willing and unwilling to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were noted. DISCUSSION: Facilitators towards vaccination were more important than barriers. Most barriers against vaccination were intrapersonal issues. Societal facilitators identified support strategies in that direction.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Vaccination , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology
3.
Med Sci Monit ; 29: e939901, 2023 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2291681

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate whether the incidence rate of musculoskeletal system disorders changed owing to the increase in the time spent on the computer by academics who did or did not provide distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS The Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire was used to assess musculoskeletal discomfort experienced in the past 1 week. In addition, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Computer Workstations Evaluation Checklist was used to assess the ergonomic structure of the work environment. The questionnaire assessed musculoskeletal system disorders and collected demographic characteristics. RESULTS The study group included 184 (101 male, 83 female) academics who provided distance education, whereas the control group included 82 (44 male, 38 female) academics who did not provide distance education. The mean ages of academics in the study group and control group were 37.46±7.34 and 41.26±10.06 years, respectively. Although computer-based work environment ergonomics were similar (P>0.05) in both groups during the pandemic, the incidence rate of musculoskeletal disorders was significantly high in the study group (P<0.001). These disorders were mostly seen in the neck, back, and waist regions (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results suggested that the incidence rate of musculoskeletal disorders increased in academics who provided distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Distance , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Musculoskeletal System , Occupational Diseases , Male , Humans , Female , Adult , Working Conditions , Pandemics , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Ergonomics
4.
Work ; 74(4): 1277-1287, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2291601

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers belong to an occupational group that is at high risk during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The increased workload of healthcare workers and the accompanying psychosocial stress caused by the pandemic can affect musculoskeletal system disorders, physical activity status, sleep quality, and fatigue in this group. OBJECTIVE: To investigate musculoskeletal system disorders, physical activity level, sleep quality, and fatigue in healthcare workers with and without a COVID-19. METHODS: A total of 200 healthcare professionals aged 18-65 years with and without a history of COVID-19 were in the study. Data were collected between January and March 2021. A "Preliminary Evaluation Form", "Extended version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal System Questionnaire (NMQ-E)", "the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF)" and "the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were used for data collection". RESULTS: It was determined that musculoskeletal system disorders did not differ significantly between healthcare workers with and without a COVID-19 history (p > 0.05). It was found that the number of people with problems in the low-back region was higher in those with a COVID-19 history (p = 0.002). In the sleep duration component, the scores of those who did not have a COVID-19 history were found to be significantly higher than those who did (p = 0.10). In other comparisons, it was determined that there was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that the number of people with problems in the low-back region was higher in those with a COVID-19 history. Those without a COVID-19 history had higher scores in sleep duration parameter.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Sleep Quality , Health Personnel/psychology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/complications , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Fatigue , Exercise
5.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(6)2023 03 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258588

ABSTRACT

Teleworking has spread drastically during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its effect on musculo-skeletal disorders (MSD) remains unclear. We aimed to make a qualitative systematic review on the effect of teleworking on MSD. Following the PRISMA guidelines, several databases were searched using strings based on MSD and teleworking keywords. A two-step selection process was used to select relevant studies and a risk of bias assessment was made. Relevant variables were extracted from the articles included, with a focus on study design, population, definition of MSD, confounding factors, and main results. Of 205 studies identified, 25 were included in the final selection. Most studies used validated questionnaires to assess MSD, six considered confounders extensively, and seven had a control group. The most reported MSD were lower back and neck pain. Some studies found increased prevalence or pain intensity, while others did not. Risk of bias was high, with only 5 studies with low/probably low risk of bias. Conflicting results on the effect of teleworking on MSD were found, though an increase in MSD related to organizational and ergonomic factors seems to emerge. Future studies should focus on longitudinal approaches and consider ergonomic and work organization factors as well as socio-economic status.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Humans , Teleworking , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology
6.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(24)2022 12 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2256088

ABSTRACT

We compared hand activity and force ratings in women and men doing identical hand-intensive work tasks. Musculoskeletal disorders are more common in women and hand-intensive work leads to an increased risk of these disorders. Knowledge of the gender influence in the rating of work exposure is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate whether women and men performing identical hand-intensive work tasks were equally rated using hand activity and normalized peak force levels with the Hand Activity Threshold Limit Value®. Fifty-six workers participated, comprising 28 women-men pairs. Four observers-two woman-man pairs-were also involved. Self-ratings and observers' ratings of hand activity and force level were collected. The results of these ratings showed no significant gender differences in self-rated hand activity and force, as well as observer-rated hand activity. However, there was a significant gender difference in the observer-rated force, where the women were rated higher (mean (SD): women 3.9 (2.7), men 3.1 (1.8) (p = 0.01)). This difference remained significant in the adjusted model (p = 0.04) with grip strength and forearm-finger anthropometrics. The results provide new insights that observers' estimates of force can be higher in women compared with men in the same work tasks. Force should be further investigated and preferably compared to objective measurements.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases , Task Performance and Analysis , Male , Humans , Female , Hand , Upper Extremity , Fingers , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Hand Strength
7.
J Environ Public Health ; 2023: 1798434, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2250618

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Working people are exposed to occupational hazards and are at risk of having occupational disease or injury in a rapidly industrializing country like Malaysia. This study aims to review and summarize the occupational disease and injury in Malaysia from 2016 to 2021. Methods: This study used PubMed and Scopus databases to conduct a systematic literature search using a set of keywords. The selected records dated from 1 January 2016 to 8 September 2021 were extracted into the Mendeley Desktop and ATLAS.ti 8 software. Systematic screening was conducted by two independent researchers and finalized by the third researcher. Data were coded and grouped according to the themes. The results were presented as the table for descriptive analysis and cross-tabulation between the themes. Results: A total of 120 records were included in this study. Under the theme of main health problems, the findings showed that mental health, infectious disease, and work-related musculoskeletal disorders are the top three problems being discussed in the literature for the working people in Malaysia. The findings also showed an increasing trend of mental health problems during pandemic COVID-19 years. In addition, hospital was the highest workplace where the occupational health problems were reported.Discussion/Conclusion. There was substantial work on the mental health problem, infectious diseases, and work-related musculoskeletal disorders as the main health problem among workers in Malaysia in the past five years. The employers must report any occupational health and injury case to the authority and prompt intervention can be initiated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Health , Humans , Malaysia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Mental Health
8.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 33: 39-45, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2241191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate self-reported musculoskeletal disorders among Indian population in work from home COVID-19 lockdown and its association on various socio-demographic and occupational factors among them. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study was conducted on working Indian professionals, through an online self-reported survey during the COVID-19 work from the home situation. Details about the perceived musculoskeletal discomforts, weight gain or loss, physical activity profile, number of working hours, total sedentary time, and satisfaction perceived with working from home were recorded from the participant responses and thereafter analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 281 responses were analyzed. 47.6% of respondents reported musculoskeletal disorders before lockdown, whereas 53.6% reported them during the lockdown period. 10% of respondents reported declination in physical activity. Finding of the chi-square for association and Spearman's rho correlation analysis suggested that gender, pre-existing musculoskeletal discomforts, current sedentary time, and long working hours are significantly associated with musculoskeletal discomforts during work from home COVID-19 lockdown. CONCLUSION: This study concluded the increment in the self-reported musculoskeletal disorders among working Indian professionals during work from home COVID-19 lockdown. The study also found the significant association between MSD and gender, working hours, sedentary time and pre-existing musculoskeletal discomforts.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Teleworking , India/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology
9.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(4)2023 Feb 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2241768

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) has increased significantly in recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a fundamental change in the lifestyles, ways of learning and working patterns of the general population, which in turn, might lead to health consequences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the conditions of e-learning and the impact of the learning modality on the occurrence of musculoskeletal symptoms among university students in Poland. This cross-sectional study included 914 students who completed an anonymous questionnaire. The questions covered two time periods (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic) and were aimed at obtaining information about lifestyle (including physical activity using the modified International Physical Activity Questionnaire, 2007 (IPAQ), perceived stress and sleep patterns), the ergonomics of computer workstations (by Rapid Office Strain Assessment, 2012 (ROSA) method), the incidence and severity of musculoskeletal symptoms (by the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, 2018 (NMQ)) and headaches. The main differences between the two periods were statistically significant according to the Wilcoxon test in terms of physical activity, computer use time, and severity of headaches. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant increase in MSD (68.2% vs. 74.6%) and their intensity (2.83 ± 2.36 vs. 3.50 ± 2.79 points) among the student population (p < 0.001). In the group of students with MSD, there was a high musculoskeletal load, due to the lack of ergonomic remote learning workstations. In future, a thorough study should be carried out, and there is an urgent need to raise students' awareness of arranging learning workstations according to ergonomic principles in order to prevent the occurrence of musculoskeletal problems.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Computer-Assisted Instruction , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Humans , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Universities , Pandemics , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Students , Headache/epidemiology , Ergonomics , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 40(11): 2038-2043, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2111743

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality between patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) and the general population in Italy. METHODS: We analysed the data from the national surveillance study promoted by the Italian Society for Rheumatology (CONTROL-19 database) including patients with RMD and COVID-19 between 26 March 2020 and 29 November 2020, compared with official data from the Italian population (within the same period) adjusted for age, sex and geographic location. The main outcome of the analyses was mortality. The relationship between RMD and mortality was analysed using adjusted logistic models and sensitivity analyses were conducted to support the robustness of our results. RESULTS: We included 668 RMD patients (62.7% with inflammatory arthritis, 28.6% with systemic autoimmune diseases), who had a mean age of 58.4 years and of which 66% were female. Compared to the general population, the RMD population showed an increased risk of death (OR 3.10 (95% CI 2.29-4.12)), independently from the differences in age and sex distribution. Even after considering the potential influence of surveillance bias, the OR was 2.08 (95% CI: 1.55-2.73). Such excess of risk was more evident in the subgroup of younger patients, and more consistent in women. Subjects with systemic autoimmune diseases showed a higher risk of death than patients with any other RMDs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RMD and COVID-19 infection evidenced a significant increase in mortality during the first pandemic phases in Italy. These findings support the need for strong SARS-CoV-2 prevention in patients with rheumatic diseases.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Rheumatic Diseases , Rheumatology , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Rheumatology/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology
13.
Pan Afr Med J ; 43: 82, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2114906

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the global pandemic of COVID-19 is the unique health crisis, the populations were exposed to situations of unprecedented confinement, this represents a major public health challenge, with a high risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders. The objective of the present work is to identify the potential effects of sedentary behavior on musculoskeletal health and physical performance. Methods: after two months of confinement a survey was uploaded and shared on Google's online survey platform. Two research laboratories, University Moulay Ismail, University Ibn Tofail, promoted the survey which was developed on the basis of two questionnaires: the French version of the Nordic questionnaire musculoskeletal disorders and the French version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). Results: out of 384 respondents, 209 (54.4%) were females 124 (32.3%) were between 30-49 years old (6.8%) and 123 (32%) had an underweight and overweight levels, respectively. One hundred and thirty-nine 139 (36.2%) reported sitting more than eight hours. The results of our survey show that many of our respondents had developed some sort of musculoskeletal pain during the confinement. One hundred and sixty two (42.2%) reported to have pain in the lower back region, 108 (28.1%) of participants reported to have pain in the neck region, 93 (28.2%) in the shoulder region, 97 (25.3) - in the upper back region and more women than men reported musculoskeletal pain in more than five regions. The results of our survey also show that 322 (83,9%) of the participants, after two months of confinement, were unable to do high intensity exercises for at least 10 min per day in their usual daytime activity, the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain differed across categories of body mass index (BMI) between males and females, (p<0.05). Conclusion: the results of this study show the existence of musculoskeletal disorders and deterioration in physical performance and strongly recommend the urgent implementation of prevention and remediation interventions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Musculoskeletal Pain , Occupational Diseases , Male , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Physical Functional Performance , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Prevalence
14.
J Occup Environ Med ; 64(11): 964-969, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2107634

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We surveyed how home-working conditions, specifically furniture and computer use, affected self-reported musculoskeletal problems and work performance. METHODS: Questionnaires from 4112 homeworkers were analyzed. The relationship between subjective musculoskeletal problems or work performance and working conditions were determined by logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: More than half the homeworkers used a work desk, work chair, and laptop computer. However, approximately 20% of homeworkers used a low table, floor chair/floor cushion, or other furniture that was different from the office setup. Using a table of disproportionate size and height, sofa, floor cushion, and floor chair were associated with neck/shoulder pain or low back pain. Disproportionate table and chair, floor cushion, and tablet computer were associated with poor work performance. CONCLUSIONS: Disproportionate desk and chair, floor cushion/chair, and computer with small screen may affect musculoskeletal problems and home-working performance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Work Performance , Humans , Interior Design and Furnishings , COVID-19/epidemiology , Teleworking , Pandemics , Computers , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/complications , Ergonomics , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/complications
15.
PLoS One ; 17(10): e0273667, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2089397

ABSTRACT

The magnitude of the cost of chronic pain has been a matter of concern in many countries worldwide. The high prevalence, the cost it implies for the health system, productivity, and absenteeism need to be addressed urgently. Studies have begun describing this problem in Chile, but there is still a debt in highlighting its importance and urgency on contributing to chronic pain financial coverage. This study objective is to estimate the expected cost of chronic pain and its related musculoskeletal diseases in the Chilean adult population. We conducted a mathematical decision model exercise, Markov Model, to estimate costs and consequences. Patients were classified into severe, moderate, and mild pain groups, restricted to five diseases: knee osteoarthritis, hip osteoarthritis, lower back pain, shoulder pain, and fibromyalgia. Data analysis considered a set of transition probabilities to estimate the total cost, sick leave payment, and productivity losses. Results show that the total annual cost for chronic pain in Chile is USD 943,413,490, corresponding an 80% to the five diseases studied. The highest costs are related to therapeutic management, followed by productivity losses and sick leave days. Low back pain and fibromyalgia are both the costlier chronic pain-related musculoskeletal diseases. We can conclude that the magnitude of the cost in our country's approach to chronic pain is related to increased productivity losses and sick leave payments. Incorporating actions to ensure access and financial coverage and new care strategies that reorganize care delivery to more integrated and comprehensive care could potentially impact costs in both patients and the health system. Finally, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic will probably deepen even more this problem.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chronic Pain , Fibromyalgia , Low Back Pain , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Adult , Humans , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Chile/epidemiology , Fibromyalgia/epidemiology , Pandemics , Sick Leave , Low Back Pain/therapy , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Costs and Cost Analysis , Chronic Disease
16.
MSMR ; 29(6): 2-9, 2022 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2072760

ABSTRACT

In 2021, as in prior years, the medical conditions associated with the most medical encounters, the largest number of affected service members, and the greatest number of hospital days were in the major categories of injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, and mental health disorders. Despite the pandemic, COVID-19 accounted for less than 2% of total medical encounters and bed days in active component service members. Injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, and mental health disorders detract from service members' individual readiness and deployability and hinder the ability to execute the missions of the Armed Forces. Continued focus on enhanced measures to prevent and treat such disorders is warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , Military Personnel , Musculoskeletal Diseases , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Morbidity , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
17.
MSMR ; 29(6): 34-39, 2022 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2072758

ABSTRACT

As in previous years, among service members deployed during 2021, injury/poisoning, musculoskeletal diseases and signs/symptoms accounted for more than half of the total health care burden during deployment. Compared to garrison disease burden, deployed service members had relatively higher proportions of encounters for respiratory infections, skin diseases, and infectious and parasitic diseases. The recent marked increase in the percentage of total medical encounters attributable to the ICD diagnostic category "other" (23.0% in 2017 to 44.4% in 2021) is likely due to increases in diagnostic testing and immunization associated with the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Military Personnel , Musculoskeletal Diseases , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Morbidity , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Pandemics , United States/epidemiology
19.
Med Lav ; 113(4): e2022031, 2022 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2026274

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and work-related stress are among the factors that can negatively affect work ability. Given the importance of midwives' health, this study aims to evaluate the work ability of midwives and to investigate its association with the prevalence of MSDs and work-related stress in midwifery. METHODS: Ninety-one midwives participated in this study. Three questionnaires, including Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire (NMQ) plus body map, Persian version of work ability index (WAI) questionnaire, and Health and Safety Executive (HSE) job stress questionnaire, were used to collect data. Finally, the association of MSDs, work-related stress, and individual characteristics with WAI among midwives was investigated. RESULTS: The highest rates of pain and discomfort were reported in the lower back and neck. The mean job stress was 116.08 with the highest scores on demand, role, and control subscales. The work ability among midwives was at an acceptable level of 39.07 on average. Inter-variable association analysis showed that the work ability was significantly associated with pain in the past 12 months and the number of coexisting MSDs. Job stress was not associated with work ability. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives' WAI was at an acceptable level despite high prevalence of MSDs in midwives, the confirmation of the possible correlation between MSDs and work ability, as well as the high job stress in midwifery. Since the present study was conducted during the Covid-19 pandemic, the high stress in midwives may be partly due to the pandemic and may not be permanent. However, this level of stress may reduce the midwives' work ability over a long time.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Midwifery , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Stress , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Pain/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Work Capacity Evaluation
20.
J Occup Environ Med ; 64(11): e782-e791, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2018297

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand the flexible work practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and their impact on work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and depression in frequent computer users. METHODS: An e-survey determined the extent of workplace changes and MSD, and the relationships between them using descriptive-statistics and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: Of 700 who commenced the survey, 511 were analyzed. Since the pandemic commenced, 80% of respondents reported they were working more from home; and 89% reported some musculoskeletal pain. Compared with prepandemic, more people worked in nonergonomic environments, computer configurations and body postures. Work location was associated with upper back pain ( P = 0.011); body posture with headache ( P = 0.027) and low back pain ( P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Nonergonomic work environments of frequent computer users during COVID-19 are related to having upper back pain, whereas nonergonomic postures are related to having headache and low back pain.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Low Back Pain , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Musculoskeletal Pain , Occupational Diseases , Humans , Workplace , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/etiology , Pandemics , Risk Factors , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Posture , Surveys and Questionnaires , Back Pain/epidemiology , Computers , Headache/epidemiology , Headache/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL